temout/ling

/LING

Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) lexical semantics (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: lexical semantics

Is in goldstandard

1
paper CO_Íkalatxt49 - : This contribution focuses on structured content at the level of lexical semantics, such as:

2
paper CO_Íkalatxt49 - : In this connection, interoperability needs to be seen through the eyes of content - not only through the glasses of content management systems.Then it can be recognized that content interoperability goes beyond the concept of semantic interoperability, as it is generally seen. Content interoperability is the capability of content items/ entities (i.e. structured content at the level of lexical semantics) to be:

3
paper corpusSignostxt319 - : What exactly is the source of the difference between ser and estar is far from settled. According to Kratzer´s (1995) and Diesing´s (1992) proposals, in which ser and estar are assumed to be the lexical exponents of IL/SL predicates, the source of the difference is the presence/absence of a spatiotemporal argument. For Arche (2007), whose analysis also views ser and estar as the lexical exponents of the IL/SL distinction, ser and estar do not differ with respect to the spatiotemporal arguments they project (since both project spatiotemporal arguments) but rather on their lexical semantics: the linking nature of estar to a specific context is lexically encoded . For Maienborn (2003, 2005) the difference between ser and estar is only pragmatic while ser and estar have identical semantics. For Schmitt (1992, 1996, 2005) and Luján (1981), the difference lies in the aspectual properties of the predicates involving ser and estar. For Clements (2005) it is essential to consider not only the

4
paper corpusSignostxt510 - : ^3No debe olvidarse, pues, que “The generative approach to lexical semantics derives its name from the use of generative devices instead of a fixed set of primitives. Much of the theory consists of structuring and integrating a number of well-known proposals on specific topics in lexical semantics and knowledge representation into one coherent theory” (Heylen, 1995: 129 ). Vid. De Miguel (2012, 2014) para un panorama actual sobre algunos proyectos lexicológicos en marcha.

5
paper corpusSignostxt201 - : Adele Goldberg, precursora y pionera de la gramática de las construcciones (Goldberg, 1995) aporta al volumen el innovador trabajo titulado Constructions, lexical semantics, and the correspondence principle: Accounting for generalizations and subregularities in the realization of arguments . El artículo introduce la tercera parte del libro denominada Lexical restrictions on syntax. La autora critica las investigaciones que tienden a proporcionar principios generalizadores para dar cuenta de algunas tendencias generales en la realización de los argumentos. En el capítulo, se defiende una revaloración del papel de las construcciones y de factores discursivos en dicha realización, de forma que las generalizaciones propuestas se vuelvan más adecuadas y productivas para predecir no solo el comportamiento de la realización argumental, sino también las distintas excepciones en ella.

Evaluando al candidato lexical semantics:

3) interoperability: 4
5) realización: 3
6) spatiotemporal: 3 (*)

lexical semantics
Lengua: eng
Frec: 64
Docs: 47
Nombre propio: / 64 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 1
Puntaje: 1.635 = (1 + (1+3.4594316186373) / (1+6.02236781302845)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)

lexical semantics

: 20. Cruse, A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
: 21. Cruse, A. (1995). Polysemy and Related Phenomena. En Saint-Dizier, P. y Viegas, E. (Eds.), Computational Lexical Semantics. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.
: 34. Cruise, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: 4. Cruse, D. A. (1995). Polysemy and Related Phenomena from a Cognitive Linguistics Viewpoint. En P. Saint-Dizier and E. Viegas (eds). Computational Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
: Anick, P. & Bergler, S. (1991). Lexical structures for linguistic inference. En J.Pustejovsky & S. Bergler (Eds.), Lexical Semantics and Knowledge Representation. Proceedings of the First SIGLEX Workshop (pp. 121-135). Berlín / Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
: Apresjan, J. (1974). Lexical Semantics. User's Guide to Contemporary Russian Vocabulary. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.
: Apresjan, J. (1995). Lexical semantics. (In Russian). Moscow: Vostochnaya Literatura RAN.
: Briscoe, T. & Copestake, A. (1991). Sense Extensions as lexical Rules. In Proceedings of ACL SIGLEX Workshop on Lexical Semantics and Knowledge Representation (pp. 88-101). California: Berkeley.
: Clements, J. C. (2005). 'Ser' and 'estar' in the predicate adjective construction. In J. C. Clements & J. Yoon (eds.), Functional approaches to Spanish syntax: Lexical semantics, discourse, and transitivity (pp. 161-202). London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
: Copestake, A. (1995). The representation of group denoting nouns in a lexical knowledge base. En P. Saint-Dizier & E. Viegas (Eds.), Computational lexical semantics (pp. 217-230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Cruse, A. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
: Goldberg, Adele. (2010). Verbs, constructions and semantic frames. En Edit Doron y Ivy Sichel (eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structures (pp. 39-58). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
: Heylen, D. (1995). Lexical functions, generative lexicons and the world. En P. Saint-Dizier & E. Viegas (Eds.). Computational lexical semantics (pp. 125-140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
: Hovav, M. R., Doron, E., & Sichel, I. 2010. Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
: Huang, Y. & Pinker, S. (2010). Lexical semantics and irregular inflection. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 1411-1461. doi: 10.1080/01690961003589476
: Landman, Fred y Susan Rothstein. 2010. "Incremental homogeneity and the semantics of aspectual for phrases". En Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure. Eds., M. Rappaport Hovav, I. Sichel y E. Doron. Oxford: OUP.
: Levin, B. & Rappaport, M. (1992). The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity. En I. M. Roca (Ed.),Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar (pp. 247-269). Foris: Berlin.
: Pustejovsky, J. (1995). Linguistic Constraints on Type Coercion. En P. Saint-Dizier & E. Viegas (eds.), Computational Lexical Semantics (pp. 71-97), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Rappaport Hovav, M., Doron, E. & Sichel, I. (2010). Introduction. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron & I. Sichel (Eds.), Lexical Semantics, Syntax, and Event Structure. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
: Rappaport, M., Doron, E. & Siche, I. (2010). Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure. London & New York: OUP.
: Ruimy, N., Gola, E. & Monachini, M. (2001). Lexicography informs lexical semantics: The SIMPLE experience. En P. Bouillon & F. Busa (Eds.) The language of word meaning (pp. 350-362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
: Sinclair, J. M. (1998). The lexical item. En E. Weigand (Ed.), Contrastive lexical semantics (pp. 1-24). Ámsterdam-Filadelfia: John Benjamins.
: Soares da Silva, A. (2003). Image schemas and category coherence: The case of the Portuguese verb deixar. En H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven y J. R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Lexical Semantics (pp. 281-298). Berlín / Nueva York: Mouton de Gruyter.
: Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases. Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
: Von Heusinger, K. & G. A. Kaiser. (2007). Differential object marking and lexical semantics of verbs in Spanish. En Kaiser, G. A. y M. Leonetti, Definiteness, specificity and animacy in Ibero-Romance languages (pp. 85-110). Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.
: Vázquez Rozas, Victoria (2006) “Gustar”. En Functional approaches to Spanish syntax. Lexical semantics, discourse and transitivity. Eds., J. Clancy Clements y Jiyoung Yoon. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins , 80-114.
: [144]Levin, Beth y Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1992. The lexical semantics of verbs of motion: The perspective from unaccusativity, en I. M. Roca (ed.), Thematic structure: Its role in grammar, Berlin, Foris: 247–269.